New research reveals intermittent walking burns significantly more calories than continuous walking over the same distance.

    Why it matters: This finding could revolutionize how we approach everyday exercise and workplace wellness programs. It suggests that breaking up physical activity into shorter segments throughout the day might be more beneficial than one longer session.

    • Traditional exercise guidelines have long emphasized sustained activity periods, but this challenges conventional wisdom.

    Key finding: Short bursts of walking or stair climbing consume 20-60% more energy than continuous activity covering the same distance.

    The body expends more energy preparing for and starting an activity than it does maintaining a steady pace, similar to how a car uses more fuel accelerating from a stop.

    According to the research

    The process:

    • 10 volunteers participated in controlled experiments
    • Participants walked on treadmills and climbed stairs
    • Activity periods ranged from 10 seconds to 4 minutes
    • Oxygen intake was measured to calculate energy expenditure

    Keep in mind: The study was relatively small with only 10 participants, suggesting more research may be needed to confirm these findings across different populations.

    Real-world impact: Office workers could benefit from multiple short walking breaks.

    • Fitness apps might need to update their calorie-tracking algorithms

    • Building designers could emphasize stair placement for intermittent use

    • Exercise programs could be redesigned around shorter, more frequent activities

    TL;DR

    • Breaking up walking or stair climbing into short bursts burns up to 60% more energy than continuous exercise.

    • The body expends more energy starting and stopping than maintaining a steady pace.

    • This research could transform workplace wellness programs and exercise recommendations.

    Read the Paper
    Move less, spend more: the metabolic demands of short walking bouts

    Share.
    Leave A Reply