Leaders who alternate between good and bad behavior cause more workplace damage than consistently abusive bosses, new research says.
Why it matters: This finding challenges conventional wisdom about workplace leadership and toxic behavior. Organizations typically focus on addressing consistently bad leaders while potentially overlooking the more damaging impact of inconsistent leadership styles.
- Traditional workplace interventions target openly abusive leaders but often ignore those who display intermittent bad behavior.
Key finding: Employees suffer greater emotional exhaustion and performance decline when dealing with unpredictable “Jekyll-and-Hyde” leadership compared to consistently negative leadership.
The process:
- Researchers surveyed 650+ full-time employees across the US and Europe
- Study examined both direct and indirect impacts of inconsistent leadership behavior
Keep in mind: The negative effects extend beyond direct reports – when senior leaders display Jekyll-and-Hyde behavior, it erodes employee confidence in middle management too.
Real-world impact: Organizations need to:
- Implement stronger accountability for sporadic abusive behavior
- Consider anger management coaching for volatile leaders
- Take seriously employee complaints about inconsistent leadership
TL;DR
- Unpredictable leadership behavior causes more workplace damage than consistent bad leadership.
- The negative impact of Jekyll-and-Hyde leadership affects entire teams, not just direct reports.
- Organizations need new approaches to address intermittent toxic behavior, as traditional interventions target only consistently abusive leaders.
Dive Deeper
Read the Paper: Jekyll and Hyde leadership: Examining the direct and vicarious experiences of abusive and ethical leadership through a justice variability lens.
News Release: “Jekyll and Hyde” leaders do lasting damage, new research shows